Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to browse PSPB online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boen, F.
Right arrow Articles by Cool, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 9, No. 4, 547-560 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430206067555
© 2006 SAGE Publications

Group Status as a Determinant of Organizational Identification After a Takeover: A Social Identity Perspective

Filip Boen

K.U.Leuven, filip.boen{at}faber.kuleuven.be

Norbert Vanbeselaere

K.U.Leuven

Marijke Cool

K.U.Leuven

This study investigates the relation between the perceived status of an organization after a takeover (i.e. post-merger status) on employees’ identification with this new organization (i.e. their post-merger identification). Respondents were 234 employees of a corrugated board producing company, which had taken over a smaller company eight months before. As hypothesized, post-merger status was positively related to organizational identification among employees of the lower-status pre-merger company, but they were not related among employees of the higher-status company. Also in line with the expectations, post-merger status was positively related to organizational identification among employees who had identified weakly with their pre-merger group, but not among employees who had identified strongly with their pre-merger group.

Key Words: group status • organizational mergers • social identity

References

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage .
  • Anastasio, P., Bachman, B., Gaertner, S., & Dovidio, J. (1997). Categorization, recategorization and common ingroup identity. In R. Spears, P. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 236-256). Oxford, UK: Blackwell .
  • Ashfort, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization . Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39 .[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Blanz, M., Mummendey, A., Mielke, R., & Klink, A. (1998). Responding to a negative social identity: A taxonomy of identity management strategies . European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 697-729 .[CrossRef]
  • Boen, F., & Vanbeselaere, N. (2002). The relative impact of socio-structural characteristics on behavioral reactions against membership in a low-status group . Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 5, 299-318 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Boen, F., Vanbeselaere, N., De Witte, H., & Lijters, K. (2003). Intergroup relations after a bank merger in Belgium: The role of perceived normativity and satisfaction with representation . Paper presented at the 11th European Congress on Work and Organizational Psychology, Lisbon, May 14-17.
  • Boen, F., Vanbeselaere, N., Hollants, K., & Feys, J. (2005). Predictors of pupils’ and teachers’ identification with a merged school . Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 2577-2605 .[CrossRef]
  • Boen, F., Vanbeselaere, N., & Swinnen, H. (2005). Predicting fan support in a merger between soccer teams: A social-psychological perspective . International Journal of Sport Psychology, 36, 65-85 .
  • Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, N. T., & Harvey, R. D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among Afro-Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 135-149 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Cartwright, S., & Cooper, C. L. (1992). Mergers and acquisitions: The human factor. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann .
  • Christ, O., van Dick, R., Wagner, U., & Stellmacher, J. (2003). When teachers go the extra-mile: Foci of organizational identification as determinants of different forms of organizational citizenship behavior among schoolteachers . British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 329-341 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Devoge, S., & Shiraki, J. (2000). People factors: The missing link in merger success . Compensation and Benefits Management, 6, 26-32 .
  • Ellemers, N. (1993). Identity management strategies: The influence of socio-structural variables on strategies of individual mobility and social change. Doctoral dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together or falling apart: Ingroup identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 617-626 .[CrossRef]
  • Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). Sticking together or falling apart: In-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 617-626 .
  • Ellemers, N., Wilke, H., & van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 766-778 .[CrossRef]
  • Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1-26). Chichester: Wiley .
  • Haslam, S. A. (2004). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage .
  • Haunschild, P. R., Moreland, R. L., & Murrell, A. J. (1994). Sources of resistance to mergers between groups . Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1150-1178 .[CrossRef]
  • Hogg, M., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts . Academy of Management Review, 25, 121-140 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Jetten, J., Duck, J., Terry, D., & O’ Brien, A. (2002). Being attuned to intergroup differences in mergers: The role of aligned leaders for low-status groups . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1194-1201 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Kessler, T., & Mummendey, A. (2002). Sequential or parallel processes? A longitudinal field study concerning determinants of identity management strategies . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 75-88 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Mummendey, A., Kessler, T., Klink, A., & Mielke, R. (1999). Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 229-245 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2003, September). Probing interactions in multiple linear regression (MLR): Interactive calculation tools for establishing simple slopes and regions of significance [computer software]. Available from http://www.unc.edu/%7Epreacher/lcamlm/.
  • Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., Kobrynowicz, D., & Owen, S. (2002). Perceiving discrimination against one’s gender group has different implications for well-being in women and men . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 197-210 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Smidts, A., Pruyn, A. T. H., & van Riel, C. B. M. (2001). The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification . Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1051-1062 .
  • Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups. London: Academic Press .
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole .
  • Terry, D. (2003). A social identity perspective on organizational mergers: The role of group status, permeability, and similarity. In A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 223-240). Philadelphia: Psychology Press .
  • Terry, D., & Callan, V. J. (1998). In-group bias in response to an organizational merger . Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2, 67-81 .
  • Terry, D. J., & O’Brien, A. T. (2001). Status, legitimacy, and ingroup bias in the context of an organizational merger . Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4, 271-289 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Terry, D. J., Carey, C. J., & Callan, V. J. (2001). Employee adjustment to an organizational merger: An intergroup perspective . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 267-280 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Tyler, T. R. (1999). Why people cooperate with organizations: An identity-based perspective . Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, 201-246 .
  • van Knippenberg, D., van Knippenberg, B., Monden, L., & de Lima F. (2002). Organizational identification after a merger: A social identity perspective . British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 233-252 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • van Knippenberg, D., & van Leeuwen, E. (2002). Organizational identity after a merger: Sense of continuity as the key to postmerger identification. In M. A. Hogg & D. J. Terry (Eds.), Social identity processes in organizational contexts (pp. 249-264). Philadelphia: Psychology Press .
  • van Knippenberg, D., & van Schie (2000). Foci and correlates of organizational identification . Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 137-147 .[CrossRef]
  • van Leeuwen, E., van Knippenberg, D., & Ellemers, N. (2003). Continuing and changing group identities: The effects of merging on social identification and ingroup bias . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 679-690 .[Abstract]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boen, F.
Right arrow Articles by Cool, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?