Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Platow, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Andrew, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 1, No. 1, 35-47 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430298011004
© 1998 SAGE Publications

Leadership Endorsement: The Role of Distributive and Procedural Behavior in Interpersonal and Intergroup Contexts

Michael J. Platow

School of Psychological Science, La Trobe University, m.platow{at}latrobe.edu.au

Scott Reid

School of Psychology, University of Queensland

Sarah Andrew

Department of Psychology, University of Otago

Previous research (Platow, Hoar, Reid, Harley, & Morrison, 1997) showed that the difference in the strength of endorsements provided for a distributively fair over an unfair leader in interpersonal contexts attenuates when the unfairness is ingroup-favoring in intergroup contexts. We extended this to the realm of procedural fairness, and manipulated a leader's distributive fairness, procedural fairness, and the interpersonal versus intergroup context of these behaviors. Results revealed independent intergroup attenuation effects as a function of distributive and procedural fairness; procedural fairness did not moderate the distributive fairness by social context interaction. These findings are discussed within a social identity framework.

Key Words: distributive fairness • intergroup relations • interpersonal relations • leadership endorsement • procedural fairness


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
M. J. Hornsey, L. Blackwood, and A. O'brien
Speaking for Others: The Pros and Cons of Group Advocates using Collective Language
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2005; 8(3): 245 - 257.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
S. A. Haslam, M. J. Platow, J. C. Turner, K. J. Reynolds, C. McGarty, P. J. Oakes, S. Johnson, M. K. Ryan, and K. Veenstra
Social Identity and the Romance of Leadership: The Importance of being Seen to be 'Doing it for Us'
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2001; 4(3): 191 - 205.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
R. Martin and O. Epitropaki
Role of Organizational Identification on Implicit Leadership Theories (ILTs), Transformational Leadership and Work Attitudes
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2001; 4(3): 247 - 262.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
J. M. Duck and K. S. Fielding
Leaders and Subgroups: One of Us or One of them?
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 1999; 2(3): 203 - 230.
[Abstract] [PDF]